32nd Regular Session of the UN Human Rights Council
De-radicalization or the Roll-Back of Extremist Violence
Thursday 23rd June 2016, from 12:00 to 14:00
Palais des Nations, Room XXV
On the occasion of the 32nd Session of the Human Rights Council, The Geneva Centre on Human Rights Advancement and Global Dialogue organized, under the auspices of the Permanent Mission of the Democratic People’s Republic of Algeria to the United Nations Office in Geneva and Other International Organizations in Switzerland, a side-event at the UN Office in Geneva entitled: De-radicalization or the Roll-Back of Violent Extremism.
Over the past years, radicalization and violent extremism have become a universal challenge for the North as well as for the South. This Panel was a follow up on the outcome of the Geneva Conference on Preventing Violent Extremism – The Way Forward, held on 7 and 8 April 2016. The discussion took place against the backdrop of the 2030 UN Agenda for Sustainable Development and, in particular, of goal no.16, which envisions promoting peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development and to provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels.
The panel discussion was opened by H.E. Dr. Hanif Hassan Ali Al Qassim, Chairman of the Geneva Centre’s Board of Management, followed by H.E. Boudjemâa Delmi, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative of the People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria to the United Nations Office in Geneva and other International Organizations in Switzerland. The moderator of the panel was H. E. Idriss Jazairy, Resident Board Member of the Geneva Centre.
The panelists included: Dr. Farhad Khosrokhavar, Sociologist and Research Director at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales , Paris; Dr. Hervé Gonsolin, Special Adviser on Peace and Security,Geneva; Dr. Raphael Liogier, Professor at the Institute d’Etudes Politique d’Aix –en –Provence, Professor at the College international de Philosophie, Paris, and Mr. Reda Benkirane, Sociologist and Research Associate at the Centre on Conflict, Development and Peacebuilding (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies),Geneva. Copies of the text of a statement by Dr. Mariem Baba Ahmed, Anthropologist, and Research Associate at the Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches sur l’Ouest Saharien (CEROS), were circulated amongst the participants during the discussion.
The discussion revolved around two distinct concepts; radicalism and radicalization. H.E. Dr. Hanif Al Qassim as well as other participants pointed out that “radicalism” is nothing but reverting to origin as the famous Arab proverb says; “Going back to origin is a virtue”. Caring about origin is a common intrinsic feeling shared by all people around the world, as it bonds people to their identities regardless of their personal inclinations. The phenomenon of reverting to origin exists in the West under what is known as “radicalism”, which had played an important role in ending tyranny and advancing democracy. The concept of radicalism per se does not entail violence; on the contrary, reverting to origin usually has quietist overtones. Hence, radicalism is about the freely espoused pursuit of authenticity.
Radicalization on the other hand is about the imposition of an “off- the- peg “value system and it is likely to lead to bigotry in the majority of cases. Violence starts when radicalization through hate speech replaces the low esteem of self by low esteem of others. Thus, people deprived of solid religious upbringing may be drawn to engaging in violent extremist action.
All participants dwelled on the importance of taking into account the variety of conditions prevailing in different countries to roll back violent extremism. They stressed the key role of security policies compliant with human rights to counter extremist violence policies in the short term.
H.E. Dr. Hanif Al Qassim indicated in his statement that studying all the solutions for managing this kind of crises, which is a shared concern for Islamic and non- Islamic countries, was not possible in two hours. He proposed to convene a meeting next autumn to study more at depth the way out of such dilemma. There was consensus amongst the participants supporting the fact that all basic rights had to be preserved, in the process, for concerned human beings, including violent extremists, as freedom of opinion is a basic inalienable right and so is non- discriminated.
H.E. Boudjemâa Delmi, Permanent Representative of the People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria to the United Nations Office at Geneva highlighted in his speech that his country organized an international conference on 15 July 2015 on the theme of de-radicalization and the roll –back of violent extremism. Participants agreed that this conference paved the way for the Geneva Conference on Preventing Violent Extremism – The Way Forward, held on 7 and 8 April 2016.
H.E. Obaid Salem Saeed Nasser Al Zaabi, Permanent Representative of the United Arab Emirates to the United Nations Geneva recalled that his country established a Ministry for Tolerance. Whereas, H.E. Saja Majali , Permanent Representative of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan to the United Nations Office in Geneva mentioned King Abdulla II Initiative for Religious and Intercultural Dialogue “The Amman Message Initiative”.
A representative from the Permanent Mission of the Republic of the Sudan to the United Nations explained that radicalization is not linked to religion; however, it is linked to politicizing religion. He also added that researchers and policy makers must consider the social and educational conditions that draw the youths to terrorist groups, analyzing this phenomenon, especially where the percentage of unemployed in the countries of the South surpasses 60 percent.
H.E. Vaqif Sadiqov, Permanent Representative of the Republic of Azerbaijan to the United Nations Office in Geneva said that radicalization did not come out of the blue, and stressed the need for analyzing the policies of some countries that according to him are part of the problem as much as they are part of the solution to the problem.
The panel witnessed a discussion, focused on finding solutions for modern societies based on the recognition of the prominent role that youths play in shaping the world’s future.Youths were never the problem; they are rather the solution to it.
A short documentary about the panel could be viewed through the following link : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ch9mMzEB670